« November 2005 | Main | January 2006 »

Daschle denied King Bush on domestic spying

Daschle's article reveals an important new episode in the resolution's legislative history.

As drafted, and as finally passed, the resolution authorized the president "to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations or persons" who "planned, authorized, committed or aided" the Sept. 11 attacks.

"Literally minutes before the Senate cast its vote, the administration sought to add the words 'in the United States and' after 'appropriate force' in the agreed-upon text," Daschle wrote. "This last-minute change would have given the president broad authority to exercise expansive powers not just overseas -- where we all understood he wanted authority to act -- but right here in the United States, potentially against American citizens. I could see no justification for Congress to accede to this extraordinary request for additional authority. I refused."

Daschle wrote that Congress also rejected draft language from the White House that would have authorized the use of force to "deter and pre-empt any future acts of terrorism or aggression against the United States," not only against those responsible for the Sept. 11 attacks.

Republican legislators involved in the negotiations could not be reached for comment last night. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/22/AR2005122202119.html

What's Wrong with Journalists/Mass Media today?

The more we non-journalists see about how the cozy little game of flirtation that reporters play with their sources and vice-versa, each needing what the other has to offer--the more unseemly and untrustworthy the whole process becomes. This is so far from the old school image of the hard bitten reporter relentlessly wearing out shoe leather, and doggedly pursuing and harassing sources to get tidbits of information out of people that did not want to talk--that I am now realizing that everything I know is wrong--at least if I read it in a newspaper, magazine, or saw it on television. It is all a massively co-ordinated effort to define a reality that is, in fact, pure fiction, and conceals a ruthless political agenda. Feh to the whole business. I am disgusted. c4logic | 12.11.05 - 2:26 pm | #
http://www.haloscan.com/comments.php?user=atrios&comment=113431694320759875

colin powell's right hand man says cheney may be "guilty of war crimes"

" Asked whether the vice-president was guilty of a war crime, Mr Wilkerson replied: "Well, that's an interesting question - it was certainly a domestic crime to advocate terror and I would suspect that it is ... an international crime as well." In the context of other remarks it appeared he was using the word "terror" to apply to the systematic abuse of prisoners."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1653936,00.html

HOLY SHIT! - via the always excellent:

http://www.warandpiece.com/